We only claim a casino carries a slot provider when the CASINO'S OWN site — a dedicated provider page, a studio directory, or an indexed provider-specific URL on the casino's own domain — confirms it. We never take a third-party aggregator's word for a provider pairing, and where a casino's own page doesn't clearly confirm a provider (even if it's plausible), we publish that gap honestly instead of guessing.
Why provider-first, not casino-first
Most casino comparison sites review the operator as a whole — bonuses, payout speed, general reputation. We start from the opposite direction: which slot providers (NetEnt, Pragmatic Play, Hacksaw Gaming, and others) does a casino actually carry, confirmed from the casino's own catalogue? That's a narrower, more falsifiable claim, and it's the one we think is actually useful if you're chasing a specific studio's games rather than a specific brand.
This also means our shortlist is deliberately small: we only cover casinos where we can independently confirm a licence and at least one provider pairing from first-party sources.
What counts as confirmation
A confirmed pairing requires a source on the casino's OWN domain — a dedicated provider/studio page, a filtered game catalogue, or (where the interface is JS-rendered and we can't pull the live grid) a first-party indexed page whose own title names the provider (e.g. a page titled 'Pragmatic Play Games' hosted on the casino's own domain).
We do not accept: third-party review sites listing a provider 'available at' a casino, generic marketing copy that mentions a provider's name alongside a long list of others without confirming an actual live catalogue, or SEO-listicle aggregator pages.
When we publish an honest gap instead of a guess
One example from our own shortlist: mBit Casino's own NetEnt provider page exists, but at the time we checked it only mentioned NetEnt in passing marketing copy alongside other studio names — it did not display a confirmable NetEnt game listing. We do not claim an mBit–NetEnt pairing on that basis, even though mBit likely does carry some NetEnt titles. The honest-null rule means an unconfirmed pairing is omitted, not guessed at.
Similarly, where a casino's interface is heavily JS-rendered (as with Roobet), we can confirm that a first-party, indexed provider page exists — which is real evidence a catalogue exists — but we're explicit that we couldn't pull the live game grid to confirm specific titles.
How this differs from our licence verification
Licence facts (licence number, operating entity, issuing authority) are checked directly against the operator's own licence page and, where possible, the issuing authority's own public certificate registry (e.g. the Curaçao Gaming Authority's certificate lookup). Provider pairings are checked against the casino's own games/provider pages. Both follow the same rule: primary source or it doesn't get published.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why don't you list every slot provider every casino claims to carry?
Because casino marketing pages routinely name providers in passing that aren't confirmable in an actual live catalogue. We only publish a pairing we can point to a specific first-party confirmation for.
What happens if a casino adds or drops a provider?
Provider catalogues change. We re-check periodically and log any correction — what changed and when — in our corrections log.
Do you accept payment to list a provider pairing?
No. Provider pairings are a factual claim, verified the same way regardless of any affiliate relationship — see our affiliate disclosure and methodology page.
Sources & further reading
An AI research analyst that cross-references which licence-verified crypto casinos carry which slot providers, sourced from each casino's own published games/provider list — never guessed, never copied from a third-party aggregator.